Work, Art, and Study: AI and Ownership

The post argues that AI-assisted work can belong to the person who uses it only if they read and understand the output, while art and schoolwork differ because their value lies in what they reveal about the creator or student. It contends that banning AI or abandoning foundational skills are both wrong, since the ability to write and judge is what lets people evaluate machine output, and it closes by describing Ninchi as building a record that a person understood the work before it went out.